Comments on: Diabetic issues Overview

By: TheOv3rlordK1ng

TheOv3rlordK1ng — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:07:17 +0000

Has no clue atall what he is talking about

By: Steve T

Steve T — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:23:45 +0000

for a complex issue, I tend to believe his hypothesis is pretty much on the
mark given how much more added sugar is put into nearly EVERYTHING. Don’t
believe me, start checking ingredient labels. I’ve been really surprised (&
appalled) at somethings that have had high-fructose syrup added when there
seemed to reason, other than to add volume for a higher profit on a
product. Does making something cost less in the short term make it a
responsible decision? I don’t know, but not everyone knows enough to even
check and in today’s world they may not care even if they do know just
because something is now ‘cheap enough’ that they can afford it.

By: ttmagic Theart

ttmagic Theart — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:38:50 +0000

Hi! Have you ever tried – Dr Rosswill Reverse Diabetes (do a search on
google)? Ive heard some unbelivable things about it and my BF got great
results with it.

By: Mark Elliott Miller

Mark Elliott Miller — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:57:50 +0000

It’s humbling to know that a physician can step back and see the human side
of his practice of medicine. God speed in your research!

By: PeanutChoco1

PeanutChoco1 — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:46:28 +0000

Attia is a hypocrite. He gets weepy-eyed about insulin resistance when
there’s SO much evidence linking high-fat and high-meat diets to IR, even
the Bellevue All Meat Trial where the men had prediabetic glucose
tolerance. He also promotes BCAA supplements when BCAAs have been linked to
IR as well via Christopher Newgard’s studies. Put this sleazy fraud out of
business.

By: EncinoRecords

EncinoRecords — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:05:13 +0000

can i remind all of you we went 10 thousand years eating grain without
obesity or dementia being a problem? yes, modern strains of GM grain are
bad, but i would be more inclined to look at our obsession with synthetic
chemicals we have had for the last 90 years that we have no evolution to
protect us from rather than the food we have evolved to consume over the
last 10 thousand years. that said, the shift to grains caused problems, as
the shift to synthetics and GM will cause problems, but at the end of the
day, more food wins out every time, and it wont stop for you today with an
exploding global middle class population.

By: Olav B

Olav B — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:59:49 +0000

What a bad, bad actor.

By: Misko Stephane

Misko Stephane — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:05:57 +0000

As far as I know, the most thoroughly and timetested diet (2+ million
years) is/was the pre-agricultural/hunter-gatherer one, which consists of
animal fat (70-80+%) as its main source of fuel; and considering that we’re
still 99.99% genetically the same as we were back then…

By: Tony Su

Tony Su — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:11:33 +0000

Why the hell is he crying?

By: Dinahsoar

Dinahsoar — Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:03:58 +0000

Thank you Dr. Attia. I think a lot of doctors judge, believing they have
the answers and that their patients are ignorant. I’ve had to fight my
doctor on the cholesterol issue for several years now. With my current
medical insurance I must comply with their suggestions to keep a lower
premium and better coverage and their standard advice is to eat low fat,
little or no sat fat and a plant based diet. I don’t comply because I
believe they are wrong. Why? Eating that way is how I ended up fat with
very high cholesterol.